Chelsea Standard--January 24, 2008

Chelsea Standard p2

Letter for the Chelsea Standard

We represent a coalition of citizens who care about the future of the property formerly owned by the Federal Screw Works (FSW). We know that the redevelopment of this site is very important to Chelsea’s economy. With that in mind, we hope Magellan Properties, the new owners of the property, consider the importance of this site to the history of our community, as well its geographic position as the “southern gateway” to the downtown business district. A historically sensitive design on this very visible site would expand (not reduce) its commercial potential, and it would also increase the broader prosperity of downtown Chelsea—in much the way the Clocktower Complex has already done—by making our city more of a regional destination.

For almost a century, generations of Chelsea residents worked in the industries that have occupied this location, even winning awards from the U.S. Army and Navy for quality production during World War II. Instead of demolishing the entire FSW site as the new owners have proposed, rehabilitating and adaptively reusing parts of the complex would contribute to the revitalization of the neighborhood, help to maintain Chelsea’s vibrancy as a “destination community”, and visibly recognize the shared heritage that defines and unites us as a community.

During the past few months, the zoning of the FSW property has attracted considerable attention in Chelsea. We are pleased that at the Planning Commission’s meeting on January 15, Magellan Properties withdrew its request that the property be rezoned to commercial (C-2), stated the intention to request a PUD zoning designation and to “use its best efforts to have the site remediate to allow second floor residential.” Second floor residential would be in line with the 2007 Draft Comprehensive Plan that designates the FSW site as “mixed use” and meets the industry model definition of the American Planning Association: “A Mixed-use Building means a building that contains at least one floor developed to nonresidential uses and at least one devoted to allowed residential uses.”

Although the site presents environmental challenges, we believe that mixed use offers the best option for preserving neighborhood and community character, as well as quality of life. Further, a mixed use design could incorporate existing elements from the site, specifically the small and architecturally distinct office buildings that anchor the complex on the northeastern and southwestern corners. A Victorian industrial office built in 1919 occupies the northeast corner, while an Art Deco style office stands on the southwest corner. Preserving these two office buildings could lead to tax incentives and other economic tools to aid in redeveloping the property, as well as contribute to local business activity and economic success. For instance, the unique office building on South Main Street could serve as an entryway to a larger building. As one example among many possibilities, see the sketch provided to the Planning Commission at their last meeting.

Increasingly, tourists and residents are drawn to communities that retain a distinctive character and identity. People from all over the region come to Chelsea for its intact historic architecture, charming downtown, and retail, arts, dining, and cultural offerings. The historic buildings of the FSW complex, and the important story they tell about the industrial history of the region, could easily attract additional visitors to Chelsea’s downtown business district.

Given the important role that the FSW has played in the history of our community, the future of the site matters to everyone in Chelsea. Maintaining tangible contact with the past strengthens the sense of continuity that is essential to a healthy community. If the buildings are demolished, they take with them an important part of our identity. No remnant remains of the multi-grade level school complex that once stood on East, Park and Harrison Streets. As the CHS Class of 1958, the last class to graduate from the high school, prepares to celebrate its 50^th reunion, many citizens have lamented the demolition of the high school designed by well-known Jackson architect, Claire Allen.

Let’s think twice before yet another piece of our history disappears.

Sincerely,

Citizens To Keep Our FSW Heritage

Merle Barr, Jr.

Larry Bean

Janet Bernath

William Chandler

Cary Church

Kathy Clark

Jane Creswell

Mark Creswell

Ian Cumming

Sara Cumming

Bob Dahlman

Diane Dahlman

Barb DeTroyer

Rick DeTroyer

Tom Diab

John Frank

Elizabeth Hammer

Kathyrn Horste

Joanne Ladio

Susan Lentz

Ron Lentz

Jan Loveland

Andrew Massey

Michelle McClellan

Scott McElrath

Lynn Meadows

Jim Menlove

Bob Merkel

Hank Muir

Shirley Muir

Jim Myles

Karen Neal

Maurine Nelson

Doug Northrop

Betty Oesterle

Janice Ortbring

Candace Pappas

John Pappas

Sandy Peterson

Sandie Schulze

Jan Sevde

Darlene Stanley

Elsie Swanberg

Amanda Tarasow

Chris Tarasow

Fritz Wagner

Bill Wescott

Susie Wescott

Norm Wetzel

Richard White

Charlotte Wyche

Don Wyche

Harry Zoccoli III

Revisioning the old FSW office with a new development

Visioning the old FSW office on South Main

Ann Arbor News

Ann Arbor News 1.16.08

Model Mixed-Use Zoning District Ordinance

The meeting of the Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 15, beginning at 7:30 at WSEC is for the purpose of defining mixed-use. This should be easy to determine, since mixed-use is clearly described in the planning literature.

The Model Mixed-Use Zoning District Ordinance from the Model Smart Land Development Regulations adopted by the American Planning Association and published in March 2006 states:

"Mixed-use Building" means a building that contains at least one floor devoted to allowed nonresidential uses and at least one devoted to allowed residential uses.


for further information, see:

www.planning.org/smartgrowthcodes/pdf/section4.1pdf

Notes from Work Session 1.8.08

Work Session PC/Magellan

1.8.08

All commissioners present; Pete Fenney in and out; Jim Drolett, both developers

Also in attendance: Larry Bean, Harry Zoccoli, Scott McElrath, Jan Bernath

others from the neighborhood

Discussion focused mostly on the lack of definition of mixed-use. Perception expressed that from both the PC Open House last year and two public hearings was that no one objects to mixed-use, but what is it? Points raised:

• while mixed-use is acceptable, it’s not activity defined
• purpose of mixed-use is to soften the context for the surrounding area
• South Main buildings more downtown look than Congdon side (more residential look)
• Casey Blair said many neighbors accept the plan
• Ann Valle said southern neighbors wanted more of a residential feel
• South Main buildings more downtown look than Congdon side (more residential look)
• Do we want to go by look or use? e.g, choose from this menu of uses...(Referred to Holmes House potentially, becoming a museum and Frank’s House potentially becoming a law office)
• Rene Papo suggested “contract zoning” as being more viable than a PUD as contract zoning stays and is essentially a deed restriction
• Rene wants this resolved soon because loans that are out there now might not be available later and wants to start the brownfield plan and tear the buildings down this summer
• Rene said much more contaminant testing has to be done to determine the amount of soil taken away. Rene mentioned that he could provide a conceptual plan for development of the property, but that due to the contamination he may have to change his plans after the demolition of the structure and conducting additional soil borings on the site.

• Rene said he could withdraw the current submittal, but didn’t formally do so

• Jim Drollet said if you say residential must be a part of mixed-use, then you are mandating residential
• Chris Rode said second storey could be an option
• Reference by someone that Rene go back to FSW about second storey residential possibility
• Rick Haugen said what is needed is guidance of planning consultant for the parameters of mixed-use; available zoning districts; address traffic in the area; and address the historic issues

Next steps:

Tuesday, 15^th, regular meeting of PC, with Planning Consultant, Carl Schmult present.

assist with definition of mixed-use

revisit how PUD compares to other zoning districts

create a zoning district that reflects the goals of the DRAFT Master Plan

get to the ordinance language

timeline:

final draft of master plan by February

to council for approval

ordinances in place

public hearing, most likely March

consider Magellan proposal

Buildings with Mixed-Use from Draft Master Plan

Mixed-Use Description for the Draft Master Plan

History of FSW by Kathy Clark

History of FSW by Kathy Clark